Three charts explain why Chesapeake is drilling in Utica shale

Though Texas’ Eagle Ford shale will be the main driver of Chesapeake Energy’s NYSE:CHK oil production growth for the next few years, the company’s acreage in Ohio’s Utica shale should also be a important contributor to its natural gas liquids NGLs production growth. Chesapeake was one of the first companies to recognize the potential of the Utica Shale, having discovered it in 2010. Now, Chesapeake is the most active driller and largest leasehold owner in the Utica, with about 1 million net acres under its belt.In the Q2 2014, Chesapeake’s Utica shale production was 67 million barrels of oil equivalents per daymboe/d, up 373% from a year ago and up 34% from the first quarter of 2014. Of the total production, Oil accounted for 10%, natural gas 60% and natural gas liquids like ethane, butane and propane about 30%. While that’s an impressive rate of growth, it could have been even higher. At the end of last year, the company had 208 wells in various stages of completion, with many awaiting pipeline connections.As the gas processing and pipeline takeaway capacity at Utica is expected to expand significantly this year, this should change. With the addition of a second train in December, the processing capacity from the Kensington plant — a joint venture between Access Midstream Partners, EV Energy Partners and M3 — had doubled by the beginning of February. Access Midstream and EV Energy are also in the process of laying gathering pipelines to deliver Chesapeake’s production to the plant. The presence of a few other such projects means that Chesapeake can double its gross processing capacity in Utica from 400 million cubic feet per day as of the end of 2013, to 800 million cubic feet per day by the end of this year. This should allow the company to get cracking on many of the backlogged wells and generate sales, as well as boost its production.Despite these factors, there have been some doubts among investors as to the financial potential of the Utica Shale. Halcon Resources, a competitor to Chesapeake, has virtually abandoned its efforts to develop its acreage in the Utica Shale, while Chesapeake keeps on investing more and more resources into the same. To understand this difference, we need to appreciate the fact that Chesapeake was the first company to turn a well into production at the Utica Shale, about three years ago. Its competitors did not start drilling for at least another year. The extra time spent by the company in the region meant that it was able to drill more than all of its competitors combined in the region. Additionally, the company was able to invest in building knowledge of the rocks beneath the acreage. In that time, CHK has amassed nearly a mile of core samples that it can use to understand the reservoir flow and to optimize completions. Furthermore, it has over 600 miles of 3D seismic data from the region, which it can use to understand the structure and to optimize lateral placement. The result should be that when the company drills in the region, it is more likely than its competitors to be successful.

via Three charts explain why Chesapeake is drilling in Utica shale – Drilling – Ohio.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s